Friday, July 11, 2008

The Cyprian Influence

[Subversive Underground]

The Cyprian Influence
by Keith Giles

For most of his life, Cyprian was a distinguished and wealthy pagan who lived in a luxurious villa which sprawled across much of the hillside of Carthage where he was born.

Born Thascius Cyprianus, he later took the name Caecilius in memory of the man who introduced him to the Christian faith. Due to his great wealth and influence in the pagan community, Cyprian was ordained as a deacon in the Christian church soon after his baptism and in very short order he was named as Bishop of Carthage, to the protest of many of the faithful in that region.

In spite of the very vocal opposition to Cyprian's fast track to Bishop-hood, which continued to plague him throughout his tenure in that office, his talents as a pagan orator and teacher of rhetoric, along with his great wealth, afforded him great influence within the 3rd century Christian church.

Early in his career as Bishop of Carthage, Cyprian was ordered to offer sacrifices to the Emperor or face persecution. He fled to a secluded village and maintained contact with the Church via an appointed contact. As more persecution came upon the members of his church, many others fled as well. However, Cyprian felt very strongly that the Church should not welcome back those Christians who escaped the sword by running away, as he had done. Instead he argued that they should be treated as unbelievers and not be welcomed back into fellowship.

Of course, when he eventually returned from hiding to resume his public office, he wrote a compelling letter explaining why his escape into seclusion was for the strengthening of the Church and that he should, therefore, be allowed to continue as Bishop of Carthage. None of the other Bishops opposed his return to his diocese and he was allowed to continue as if nothing had transpired.

Cyprian's greatest influence on the Church was introducing the concepts of priest, temples, rituals, altars and sacrifices to the faith. Until his writings, the Christian church had operated under the New Testament system, largely influenced by Jesus and his Apostles, which held firmly to the notion that the temple, the priesthood and the sacrifice were fulfilled in Christ at His Crucifixion and further that His Followers were also the temple of God, the royal priesthood and that their sacrifice was expressed in the way they lived their lives each day.

Because of Cyprian's skill as an orator and his prominence as a Bishop in Carthage, his pagan ideas of worship were given serious acceptance within the larger Body of Christ. In his writings Cyprian argued for a return to Old Testament Jewish practices which closely mirrored the concepts he had grown up with in a paganized culture.

Sadly, the Christian faith adopted Cyprian's ideas of spiritual covering, the special clergy caste, the importance of ritual and the need for a temple and sacrificial system of worship within one generation, effectively undoing the revolutionary concepts of Church found in the New Testament.

Inspired by Jesus, the Apostles established a community of believers, a church, based on the revolutionary concept of People-as-Temple and a corporate body which depended not upon a special clergy class, but upon the Holy Spirit Himself.

"...the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you." - Jesus (John 14:26)

Under this radical new concept, the Church was built upon the foundation of Christ as our ultimate priest and sacrice and temple so that each of His followers could also become a temple of the living God, a daily sacrifice and a priest of God.

No one was more vocal about this concept of a living temple of God than Paul the Apostle who wrote prolifically on the subject in nearly every single epistle.

"Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit lives in you?" 1 Cor 3:16

"Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own." 1 Cor 6:19

"What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said: "I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people." 2 Cor 6:16

"Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and aliens, but fellow citizens with God's people and members of God's household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. In him the whole building is joined together and rises to become a holy temple in the Lord. And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit." - Eph 2:19-22

Peter himself was also very clear on the concept of a living temple made up of people who were also the new priesthood and the daily sacrifice.

In his first epistle he clearly outlined this very concept to those early Christians:

"As you come to him, the living Stone—rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him— you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ." 1 Peter 2:4-5

"But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy." - 1 Peter 2:9-10

Sadly, in the third century, Cyprian came on the scene and unraveled the tightly woven tapestry spun by Jesus and taught by His Apostles in the New Testament by someone who clearly did not fully understand the genius of this design.

Jesus himself spoke clearly on this subject when asked by the woman at the well about the location and method of proper worship to God. His response was that the temple in Jerusalem was no longer the "special" place to find God. Instead, one could find and worship God wherever they stood, as long as God's Spirit was within him or her.

"Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth." - Jesus (in John 4:23-24)

The very fact that the early followers of Jesus did not adopt a system of priesthood, or continue to offer daily sacrifices in a special temple bears witness to the fact that, as evidenced in the Apostolic writings, there was a new temple, priesthood and sacrifice now, and they were it.

Under Christ, the priesthood was now more than just one man overseeing a congregation of several hundred people, the priest was now every single one of those people. It was an exponential multiplication of priests who were also temples of God's Holy Spirit where a daily sacrifice of will and self took place.

"Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God—this is your spiritual act of worship.
- Romans 12:1

"Then (Jesus) said to them all: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it." - Luke 9:23-24

When Cyprian re-wrote the New Testament to fit his own ideas about temple, priest and sacrifice, he effectively introduced a doctrine into the Church which continues to pervade our concepts of worship and church to this very day and hour.

But, what if we could return to the ideas of the New Testament? What if we could learn to live as if God's Holy Spirit lives within every single follower of Jesus? What if we could begin to think of ourselves as priests of God who daily offer themselves as living sacrifices so that Christ could live through us?

What if?






Adam said...

Very interesting...Mark and I have had a separate discussion about how the role of pastor has been corrupted somewhere along the line. He directed me to a website (
)that has somewhat different reasoning than yours, but sounds like with basically the same effect.

I think something has to be wrong. Church's success or failure, particularly in American churches, are much too susceptible to who the pastor is. A very popular fundamental preacher here in the Southeast once said "everything rises and falls on leadership." I somewhat agree with that, but something seems amiss when the success of a God-ordained "institution" (forgive that word please) is dependent on the efforts and abilities of one man.

I am in a church now where the pastor is for all practical purposes a dictator. I don't think he is trying to have all the power or something like that (i.e. I don't think his intentions are wrong). I think he believes God's plan is for a pastor to be a really strong leader. Probably mixed in there is lack of trust of anyone else to get any of the work done. But, 1) he's probably going to kill himself doing everything; 2) he's not fostering others in church to develop into leadership roles; 3) it's annoying.

My issues aside, allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment and ask a few questions.

1) Wouldn't God preserve the scriptures for us?

2) If not, then what can we trust at all in the Bible as being accurate?

3) Don't churches or any other "organization" that involves people need a hierarchy in place? Lack of organization is confusion, and God is not the author of confusion.

4) Is there a "correct" translation of the Bible out there that can be used?

5) Is there supposed to be a pastor at all? Or do we all just show up and share testimonies?

Keith Giles said...


Great comments. Let me attempt to answer your Q's

1) Wouldn't God preserve the scriptures for us?
Yes, and thank God He did! The Scriptures didn't change, but our understanding and application of them did around the 3rd century due to Cyprian, Constantine and other Pagan influences.

2) If not, then what can we trust at all in the Bible as being accurate?
We can only trust the Bible.

3) Don't churches or any other "organization" that involves people need a hierarchy in place? Lack of organization is confusion, and God is not the author of confusion.
Read "The Starfish and the Spider" and you'll see tons of examples of very successful organizations that thrive under peer-led, shared leadership (i.e. - Alchoholics Anonymous, Craigslist, Wikipedia, the Apache Indians, and the early Christian Church, to name a few).

4) Is there a "correct" translation of the Bible out there that can be used?
Any Bible you're currently using should be fine (NIV, NAS, NASB, NKJV, etc.)

5) Is there supposed to be a pastor at all? Or do we all just show up and share testimonies?
Pastors? Yes, along with Apostles, Teachers, Prophets, Preachers, and those who have any of the other 28 spiritual gifts of the Spirit distributed by God for the building of His Church (that's us, the people of God).

I'd recommend you read "Pagan Christianity" by Barna and Viola, or any historical book on Constantine and/or a history of the early Christian Church...although I warn you if you do you'll be disappointed by what you discover.

Adam said...

Thanks for answering my questions!

I have to admit, I'm skeptical of a truly leaderless organization working. I realize Christ is the head, but having been in the corporate world a while, one truth I have found regarding human nature is that people WANT to be led. I will check out the books you suggest. But what about Romans 12:5-8 which I was always taught about spiritual gifts?....there is a Leadership "gift." That doesn't mean a pastor has this gift, but undoubtedly it would help. Regardless, this passage insinuates a multi-member, multi-function organization with people in leadership roles. If the pastor is not designated the "leader" then who is? Is it the person who has been gifted with Leadership regardless?

Just curious, how does your house church operate?

Keith Giles said...


I'll try to answer your Q's here.

"...having been in the corporate world a while, one truth I have found regarding human nature is that people WANT to be led."

Yes, people do want to be lead, but what I've learned is that leadership doesn't have to look like what we're used to seeing in the church.

The traditional church models a CEO leadership and takes its cues from the business world, but there are other forms of leadership that don't take the "I'm the boss" approach.

The form of leadership that Jesus modelled was to wash the feet of his followers, and then he commanded them to do the same, especially pointing out that when they lead others they were not to "Lord it over people" as the pagans did/do.

Leadership, as modelled by Jesus, is by example, based on servant hood and facilitates dialog, cooperation and teamwork, not a professional clergy class.

"But what about Romans 12:5-8 which I was always taught about spiritual gifts?....there is a Leadership "gift.""

You're correct, but again, we cannot assume that "leadership" means what we've come to know it as simply because that's the model we've grown up with. Does the Bible show us a different model for leadership? Yes, it does. My argument is that we, as followers of Jesus, need to adopt the model that Jesus gave us, not the one we've borrowed from Bill Gates and Starbucks, etc.

"...this passage insinuates a multi-member, multi-function organization with people in leadership roles. If the pastor is not designated the "leader" then who is?"

You're getting it. The Bible gives us a model where function within the Body is shared and relational. Each person contributes something that no one else can using their unique gifts.

"Just curious, how does your house church operate?"

Glad you asked! I've got several articles I could send you which describe this in greater detail, (and I'll email those links to you if you ask me at "elysiansky" at hotmail (dot) com), but essentially I facilitate our share times together and try not to dominate the dialog, allowing everyone (even the children) to share insights into scripture, communicate a testimony, provide an insight, etc. to encourage the rest of us in our walk with Christ.

There are times when I need to exert my "Pastoral Authority" but usually everyone plays nice and most of the leadership you'd expect to see is done behind the scenes, in private and one-on-one with those who need a loving rebuke or a nudge in the right direction.

Thanks for your comments and your questions, Adam.


Joel Hickenbottom said...

Hey Steve,

I just got around to reading this post. You mentioned in your post how "the Christian faith adopted Cyprian's ideas of spiritual covering". I was just wondering if you could please elaborate more on this statement and what you mean by "spiritual covering".

Thanks Steve. Hope this comment finds you well!

Keith Giles said...

For the record, my name is Keith. But you may call me Steve if you like.

To answer your question:

The concept of "Spiritual Covering" is one where any new church plant must have a blessing or an endorsement from an existing, recognized church leader or body of believers in order to be considered legitimate and/or protected from the Enemy.

In essence, the doctrine is unbiblical and is essentially maintaining power and control over others.

This is not just my opinion, btw. I recently asked mentors of mine to weigh in on this subject and all of them, from traditional church pastors to Directors of nationwide ministries agreed with me, 100% that the doctrine is unbiblical.

I spoke to Todd Hunter, Paul Martin, and three of my traditional pastor friends and all of them agreed, which surprised me.

If you'd like to read a more detailed account of this I've got an article on my blog here:

What we need is spiritual accountability. This is Biblical. Spiritual Covering is a teaching that only serves to keep people under control.

Hope that helps.